go for it, point it at archives.postgresql.org though, since that is the major part of the search engine
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, scott.marlowe wrote: > On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > okay, first off ... what URL? I've been working on, and testing, archives > > all week, and altho getting things down below a 2min search appears to be > > near impossible (anyone know something *better* then mnogosearch that will > > handle >250k URLs and growing ... ? we tried ht/Dig before, and the > > resources it suck'd were outrageous) ... > > Hi Marc, I use htdig at work to index a rather large web site and it > doesn't use resources all that bad. My htdig db directory is only 250 > megs and it screams. Are you sure it was that bad? > > Would it be ok if I pointed a test instance of htdig at postgresql.org at > night and indexed it to get an idea of how much space it'll take to index > it? I'm a huge fan of htdig/ warts and all, so I'd kinda like to see if > it can be made to work. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])