On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 15:27:23 +0000, Rob Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently subscribed to pgsql-general and wheneven every I hit > reply, I keep forgetting to reply-to-all so that my mail client includes > a cc to the pgsql-general list. > > I keep doing this because I keep forgetting the Reply-To field isn't set > to the pgsql- mailing list. > > I was wondering if anyone else thought it might be a good idea (or not) > to use this ?
Its not. You should probably just get used to doing reply to all. If you want to reply just to the sender you can use reply to sender on these lists but will have to go through some contortions on your broken lists. I usually filter out reply-to headers on lists that mung them so as not to break reply to sender on my client. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
