Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Christopher is correct ... if there was such a thing as an 'end all, be > all' replication solution, there wouldn't be a half a dozen different ones > out there ... > > It would be unwise for *anyone* to state "never" as far as inclusion of > built-in replication, but since the general consensus is that there is no > such thing as the 'all-encompassing solution' for this, the chances of one > ever coming about that would be of a scope that would be acceptable to be > built-in is next to zero ...
OK, I reworded the replication TODO section and moved it under Administration: * Improve replication solutions o Automatic failover o Load balancing o Master/slave replication o Multi-master replication o Partition data across servers o Queries across databases or servers (two-phase commit) o Allow replication over unreliable or non-persistent links -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org