On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi all,
> >>where I work some times we need to find our documents
> >>searching for a couple of words. I was thinking to
> >>use the tsearch2.
> >>
> >>Shall I use OpenFTS?
> >>Do you have any suggestion ?
> >>
> >
> >
> > tsearch2 is ok if you have docs and db on the same server, OpenFTS
> > is a middleware on top of tsearch2.
>
> What advantage I have on use OpenFTS instead of use tsearch2 directly ?
> I read the FAQ but I'm still missing what I can do with OpenFTS that I
> can not with tsearch2.
ok. OpenFTS abstracts document storage, so you could process and store
documents on separate server, while full text indices (tsearch2) live in
other server.
>
> Regards
> Gaetano Mendola
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet,
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia)
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
