On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:52:06AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Lee Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > When I use pg_dump to back up the whole database and then pg_restore an
> > individual table,
> > pg_restore uses COPY. Great.
> > When I use pg_dump to back up an individual table and pg_restore it,
> > pg_restore uses INSERT.
>
> Not for me...
>
> That decision is fixed at pg_dump time; it's not possible for pg_restore
> to change it, because the data is already that way (or not) in the dump
> file. Maybe you misinterpreted what you saw?
Is there any reason why we don't use a binary storage in custom format
dumps? I mean, we could open a binary cursor and write the results to
the file, and read it back at restore time. This is just handwaving of
course.
I guess the reason is cross-version portability?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
"World domination is proceeding according to plan" (Andrew Morton)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
