On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 14:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Personally, I think that when one creates a non-btree index, one should
> > get a warning saying that non-btree indexes are not necessarily
> > transactionally safe in the event of a crash.
>
> As of 8.1, GIST indexes are WAL-logged, so that would be inappropriate
> anyway.
Only in this exact instance. It still might make sense to emit such a
warning / notice when using a non Wal logged index of any kind though.
Glad that GiST indexes got the WAL logging, btw, my tanks to whoever did
the work.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
