-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is one bet I'm glad to lose. :-)
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Ned Wolpert escribió: > >> In my current production environment, the PostgreSQL database server >> is the latest, 8.2.4. The apps that communicate with it are planned >> to be running on stock CentOS5 servers, with the default 8.1.x (8.1.9) >> client libraries. So, not only is psql 8.1.9 (which I don't use on >> that server) but the libpq.so is from the 8.1.9 install. Apache 2.2 >> package uses the DBDriver module from the apr-util that was installed >> from CentOS, and we are planning to connect it to our PostgreSQL >> server. Is that a 'bad thing' considering the libpq.so is a different >> major version? > > No. It is only a problem for psql because it uses some queries that > assume things about the system catalogs (for example psql 8.2 assumes > that pg_index.indisvalid exists, which it doesn't on 8.1). > > Did you win the bet? > - -- Virtually, Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ACF63C1E An idea is something you have; an ideology is something that has you. -Morris Berman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGlp+92nkMaKz2PB4RAp0iAJ9jUJPlExZSf1y0XHsQAfS9rTBWjwCeNDzS TNS8x8Bf4Wu1BSjBH+CdJnE= =9hq3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
