>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at  3:33 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
 
>   update tablename set datecol=null
> ~ 2.3 mio rows
> 
> After 6 hours, this was still not finished. selects and inserts are ok.
> System is a dual xeon, 8gb ram, debian 64bit, pg 8.1.4
 
You do realize that every row updated is a delete and an insert,
right?  So this should take as long as a single database transaction
which deleted all the rows in the table and inserted them again.
 
If datecol is null in any rows, you should try:
 
update tablename set datecol=null where datecol is not null;
 
If you have canceled the update because of the long run time, you
will have left a lot of dead rows in the table, which will make the
next attempt run even longer.  Be sure you are doing vacuums.
 
-Kevin
 



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to