Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Matthew T. O'Connor escribió:
As Alvaro already said this is a case where autovacuum still isn't great.

While I have your attention ;-) do you have any ideas on how to improve
this?  I don't see anything that looks like a solution for this case.

No good ideas, but a few random thoughts. 1) Can we make vacuum not block analyze? That way we can continue to analyze a table while it's being vacuumed.
1b) If not, can we make auto-analyze bump auto-vacuum?
2) Maintenance windows. They wouldn't solve this problem, but they might mitigate it some.


--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply via email to