Hi Julius Tuskenis, Many thanks for helping me. These are good solutions. But I have some doubts Look below
On Oct 10, 11:06 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Julius Tuskenis) wrote: > I would suggest you 2 solutions: > 1. to use a function to edit these fields. That way you will be sure > that you will not forget to update both tables. > 2. use a trigger on master table. If I understand you - the history > table could be filled using trigger, when data in master table changes. > That way you could change only master table in your application. > I think having triggers would bring performance down. So instead can we have single sql update statement to update all four fields of two tables? Just a crazy idea. > Good luck! > Thanks for the wish. These wishes needed to implement smart solution to above problem :) -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
