Isabella Ghiurea <isabella.ghiu...@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca> wrote: > I don't think optional is the right word,. The issue is that the server has no clue what the application is beyond what the client sends over the wire, so the server must trust the client to tell it something useful. There is a lot of code out there which doesn't set this (so far nonexistent) connection property, and I'm sure that breaking all of that code is not an option. Hence, if we add it, it will be optional. > This information should be collected in one of the internal table, > next to client's host ip and user name . This would probably show up in pg_stat_activity somewhere. > BTW: I don't know to much about PG 's " feature wish list " , if > we get more feedback from some of the Gurus we can add this one > to the list. There is a TODO list. http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo I'll suggest this be added. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
