On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:36, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I can see how "access to" might be read as specifically meaning "CONNECT > privilege for". Should we change this message from "access to whatever" > to "privileges for whatever", or some such wording?
+1, There have been a few times I found that message not very um helpful. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin