On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:36, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I can see how "access to" might be read as specifically meaning "CONNECT
> privilege for".  Should we change this message from "access to whatever"
> to "privileges for whatever", or some such wording?

+1, There have been a few times I found that message not very um helpful.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply via email to