Gerhard Hintermayer <gerhard.hinterma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just checked my indices, looks like the only table in all my 5 > DB's that has a hash index is the one I ran tests on. Well, actually that's pretty lucky. If you'd tested with other indexes, you might have gone live with the broken index. I would seriously consider converting the index to btree at this point, to simplify life, unless you can show a significant performance benefit with the hash index running your actual application mix. > But the other thing is the huge amount of transfer volume when > rsyncing the data dir from the new primary to set up the new > replication slaves. But this should go away when I stop using > REINDEX DATABASE, right ? That should make a big difference, yeah. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
