Am 14.11.2012 04:19, schrieb Tom Lane:
Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
On 11/14/2012 06:12 AM, Aaron Bono wrote:
Am I reading this right?  Are there individual connections using over
300 MB or RAM by themselves?
If I recall correctly, RSS is charged against a PostgreSQL back-end when
it touches `shared_buffers`. So that doesn't necessarily mean that the
back-end is using the full amount of memory listed as RSS.
Yeah.  Since Aaron's got shared_buffers set to 256MB, the shared memory
segment is something more than that (maybe 270-280MB, hard to be sure
without checking).  The RSS numbers probably count all or nearly all of
that for each process, but of course there's really only one copy of the
shared memory segment.  RSS is likely double-counting the postgres
executable as well, which means that the actual additional memory used
per process is probably just a few meg, which is in line with most
folks' experience with PG.

The "free" stats didn't look like a machine under any sort of memory
pressure --- there's zero swap usage, and nearly half of real RAM is
being used for disk cache, which means the kernel can find no better
use for it than caching copies of disk files.  Plus there's still 10G
that's totally free.  Maybe things get worse when the machine's been up
longer, but this sure isn't evidence of trouble.
Keep in mind though that (SysV) SHM is accounted as "cached" in all Linux tools (I know), thus "free" is never "complete" without "ipcs -m" + "ipcs -mu" outputs. However I second Tom here; your machine looks perfectly healthy. Note that RSS usage of your sessions can quickly "explode" though (due to copy on write) if your clients start creating large return sets (and in the worst case, take a lot of time to "collect" them).

You might consider deploying atop (atoptool.nl), which offers to sum up all data based on user and/or process name, and will enable you to track the usage stats to the past. Plus the latest version could already have a seperate display for SHM usage (at least Gerlof promised me to add it ;-).

Cheers,

--
Gunnar "Nick" Bluth
RHCE/SCLA

Mobil   +49 172 8853339
Email: gunnar.bl...@pro-open.de
__________________________________________________________________________
In 1984 mainstream users were choosing VMS over UNIX.  Ten years later
they are choosing Windows over UNIX.  What part of that message aren't you
getting? - Tom Payne



--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin

Reply via email to