On 7 May 2013 03:54, Uwe Schroeder <u...@oss4u.com> wrote: > On Mon, 05/06/2013 05:51:00 PM Scott Marlowe wrote: > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Misa Simic <misa.si...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > But, IMO it is something totally irrelevant now-days... With today > > > tools... > > > I understand why such thing has been important 20-30 years ago (in > > > previous > > > century) > > > > You're assuming we all use the same tools. There are still people on > > this who (probably) read their email with pine. > > I understand that there's purists out there, but seriously, pine? I stopped > using that when I had the first SPARC2 sitting on my desk and I can't even > remember when that was (1991?). Never liked pine, always used emacs (and > still > do, just not for reading mail :-) ) > > Personally I prefer top posts for short responses to a simple issue and in- > between posts for everything more complex. > > And then, when some people will top post, som bottom post and some will answer inside the original email lines, then there will be a totall mess and most people will have problems to find out how the discussion flow looks like.
- Szymon
