Sean Chittenden wrote: > > Why exactly did you want the initial SET to not be part of the > > transaction? > > Is having an exception all that bad? What other tunables should be > outside of the reach of transactions? Maybe an exception should be > applied to a class of SET tunables. -sc
I am fine with exceptions _if_ we force them to start a transaction, meaning they are their own transactions basically. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
