On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 19:34, scott.marlowe wrote: > On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > > > "scott.marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is it possible to remove the implicit search path of pg_catalog from a > > > psql session without it breaking lots of stuff? > > > > Do you consider "+", "count()", etc to be important stuff? > > Me, hardly ever use them :-) So I can assume that removing the implicit > pg_catalog from the search path is a "bad thing."
From the search_path certainly -- but we can we teach the difference between implicit and explicit to the *is_visible functions?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
