On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:15:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > > Not that I know of. However, the first step is to add this regression > > test for SIGFPE [-patches CCed]. > > This seems completely pointless. The question is not about whether the > SIGFPE catcher works when fired, it's about what conditions trigger it.
Well, depends how you look at it. The original bug report was about a backend crash, which is what happens if you don't catch the SIGFPE. Can we guarentee that we know every situation that might generate a SIGFPE? Besides, isn't this what you were referring to here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-04/msg00091.php Otherwise we should just fix int4div. -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
