Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Montag, 17. März 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > It's not, IMHO. You don't even know if the local database is where the
> > user is intending to connect to. Moreover this presupposes some rather
> > obsolete ideas about what connection parameters might need to be given
> > on the command line.
>
> "psql <TAB>" to complete the local database names is a very useful feature
> that has existed and been in use for a long time.
Agreed. If it can be made to work with remote database when the user
already provided the -h option, even better. (And while at it,
providing options for -h completion from .pgpass would be neat too.)
BTW while reading the psql manpage I noticed this statement:
A popular application of this facility is to refer to the last
inserted OID in subsequent statements to build a foreign key
scenario.
(This refers to :foo interpolation.) Talking about popular application
of OIDs in FKs seems so 90's. Should we remove that phrase?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
