On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:30:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 12:01:32AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> I don't know about Windows, but on Linux -lpq should always be enough > >> (unless > >> you are linking statically). Everything else would seem to be a bug. > > > Yup, linking statically. > > Do you have a really good reason for doing that? Just about every > distro nowadays strongly discourages static linking, because it makes > it so painful to deal with bug or security fixes in libraries. (Red Hat > won't even distribute static libraries except in some special cases, > and libpq definitely isn't one of the exceptions.)
I'm linking a commercial application. It was thought to be more convienent to use static libraries for deplyoment purposes. What do you think? Bob Rossi -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
