"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +     root->parse->rtable = list_union(root->parse->rtable, subquery->rtable);

That's one heck of a scary patch: nowhere in list_union's API is there
any guarantee that it preserves list ordering, but we *must not* change
the positions of the existing rtable entries.

I think it might be better to fix the problem in
pull_up_union_leaf_queries instead; given that it wasn't broken till
recently, I think it's arguably that function's fault.  Can we redesign
it to pull up everything in the subquery rtable, not just what was
referenced?

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to