Zahid Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I see one behavior change is PG8.3 and PG 8.2 .I was getting error of > underflow value in PG8.2 when i > tried to insert '1E-307' in double precision column .And my > application was expecting the same error condition with the same > values against PG 8.3.3 as well.but now this vaule is inserted > successfully.I was thinking is this expected ,or was broken in PG 8.2 ?
It's not particularly surprising; we now allow denormalized numbers if the platform supports them. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs