Zahid Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I see one behavior change is PG8.3 and PG 8.2 .I was getting error of
> underflow value in PG8.2 when i
> tried to insert '1E-307' in double precision column .And my
> application was expecting the same error condition with the same
> values against PG 8.3.3 as well.but now this vaule is inserted
> successfully.I was thinking is this expected ,or was broken in PG 8.2 ?
It's not particularly surprising; we now allow denormalized numbers if
the platform supports them.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
