On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:11 AM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Brendan Jurd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I have some thoughts on this and other issues surrounding AM/PM, but >> perhaps they are better reserved for a separate thread. Might I >> suggest we apply Alex's bugfix and hold off on the message changes >> pending further discussion? > > Agreed on separating the message issue. What I wanted to know was > whether there are similar bugs elsewhere in to_timestamp, or whether > you're pretty sure this is the only occurrence of the coding pattern? > I've always found it helpful to think "where else did we make this > same mistake" after identifying a bug. > > regards, tom lane >
I guess we know this already, but for the sake of trying to appear involved, I've confirmed this fixes the problem as I was seeing it. +1 for the message being a bit more specific, though it's a definite improvement as is. - Josh PS> My apologies for sending this directly to Tom instead of to the list the first time I sent it. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
