"Erik Rijkers" <e...@xs4all.nl> writes: > I ran into a bug in pg_restore, where it silently omits > to restore a constraint (here a primary key):
pg_restore's notion of what -t means is very much more restricted than pg_dump's is. We might change this someday, but don't hold your breath (ie, it's a missing feature not a bug). In the example at hand I'd suggest just using the -t switch on the dump side and not passing anything to pg_restore. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs