On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On the patch, the kluge to set InRecovery is unnecessary and confusing.
> 
> I'll look into a better way to do that tonight.  Did you have any
> specific improvement in mind?

Yes, all already mentioned on this thread.

I'm unable to spend time on this tomorrow, but I think the main elements
of the solution are there now. The bug was found in my feature, so mea
culpa. Thanks to everybody for helping identify and fix it.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com
 PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to