On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 19:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On the patch, the kluge to set InRecovery is unnecessary and confusing. > > I'll look into a better way to do that tonight. Did you have any > specific improvement in mind?
Yes, all already mentioned on this thread. I'm unable to spend time on this tomorrow, but I think the main elements of the solution are there now. The bug was found in my feature, so mea culpa. Thanks to everybody for helping identify and fix it. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs