On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Craig
Ringer<cr...@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
> Interestingly, though, the test program does appear to be leaking - at
> least, the peak working set slowly climbs. It's all private working set. Not
> sure why yet since the memory use looks like it _should_ be constant.
How does the return value of str() get cleaned up here?
PGresult* res=PQexec(conn,insert.str().c_str());
--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
