Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: >> go with the suggestion of having a character string literal type, >> and change the semantics such that if there is a valid >> interpretation of the statement with the character string literal >> taken as text, it should be used; if not, resolve by current >> "unknown" rules. > > There is already a weak preference for resolving unknown as text in > the presence of multiple alternatives. So I'm not sure that you're > suggesting anything different from what happens now. It is certainly different for the example I gave up-thread involving "char". Perhaps that is a very unique and isolated situation. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
