Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > This means that the WAL replay of that record type has never been tested > correctly :-(. Looking closer at writeListPage(), why does it always > include 'workspace' in the WAL record, even if a full-page-image is > taken? It's not used for anything the the redo function. That's > harmless, but bloats the WAL record unnecessary. In fact it might be > better to never do full-page writes for that record type, since it > completely overwrites the page anyway.
Actually, the entire thing is misdesigned from the get-go. AFAICS it shouldn't even have its own WAL record type --- it should be using log_newpage(). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs