"Kevin Grittner" <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> writes: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Suppose that after the postmaster is fully up, it writes a file >> $PGDATA/postmaster.ports, with contents along the lines of >> >> 5432 >> /tmp/.s.PGSQL.5432 > The listen_addresses setting would need to figure in, too.
Yeah, I'm not entirely sure how we'd want to deal with IP addresses, but in principle there could be a line for each postmaster socket not only the Unix-domain socket. > This seems likely to overlap the review I was soon going to do of the > differences between pg_ctl behavior and what is required for LSB > conformance. Agreed, it would be good to do a holistic review of what pg_ctl needs. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs