Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Ok, committed that way. I made the cross-check a WARNING. That seems >> like the right level of seriousness, although I see that many of the >> other similar checks are Asserts. > > Looks good. I'm a bit tempted to rename the interXact argument to > something like noOwner --- no change in API, just name it a bit closer > to what it actually does now. Thoughts?
Well, I did keep the cross-check at end-of-transaction, so it's not a complete misnomer as it is; a file opened with interXact=false can't be used across transactions. I won't object if you feel like renaming it, though. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
