On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Robert Haas escribió: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> > Hmm. Cute, but I wonder why we shouldn't just be throwing an error. >> > As I said last night, the only thing I see wrong with the current >> > behavior is that the error message isn't phrased in a way that makes >> > it obvious it's the user's fault. >> >> I think the problem we're trying to solve is that the view works but >> it isn't dumpable. > > So it would also be a solution that the ALTER TABLE that renamed the > column throwed an error if there's a view that requires the name.
Yes. I don't think it's as good of a solution, but it is a solution. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
