Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: > BTW, did #4907 ever get fixed in the back branches?
No, I didn't think it was prudent to back-patch it. Also, #5240
represents an actual regression (cases that worked before 8.4 now
fail) whereas the plpgsql cases never have worked.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
