Robert Haas a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
I can see VACUUM making VACUUM FULL faster. I don't think VACUUM FULL
should make VACUUM FULL ANALYZE faster.
Err, let me correct myself. A second VACUUM FULL should be faster
than the first one. But the two together I wouldn't expect to be
faster than doing it all in one shot.
...Robert
Thank you Robert for your comments.
What seems to be a bug, could be a feature ?
May be performing a simple VACUUM first before a real VACUUM FULL
can be a solution to increase VACUUM FULL performances ?
(I mean VACUUM FULL could be done in 2 sequences , first a simple VACUUM then a
real VACUUM FULL).
The time difference is sometime 1 for 10 ! But it should be confirmed on other
platforms and OS ...
Thanks anyway, I will stay with my three commands sequence, waiting for the new
CLUSTER command...
Postgreqlement .
--
Salutations - Best regards - mit freundlichen Grüssen
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
