On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Alexey Klyukin <al...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> I think this might be the same problem previously discussed here: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-01/msg00224.php > > Seems to be the same problem. Backtrace I'm getting on 8.4 is almost > identical to the one at the end of this post: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-01/msg00144.php > >> Does that patch fix it? > The problem doesn't appear on 9.0 alpha with that patch committed.
It looks like the plperl.c change applies cleanly back to 8.2, though I haven't yet verified that it actually fixes the problem on all those branches. 8.1 does nothing at all instead of decrementing the reference count: - /* need we delete old entry? */ + hash_search(plperl_proc_hash, internal_proname, + HASH_REMOVE, NULL); + if (prodesc->reference) + SvREFCNT_dec(prodesc->reference); + free(prodesc->proname); + free(prodesc); I am not inclined to apply the additional regression tests, even on HEAD. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
