On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 20:19, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >What you're saying, IIUC, is > that if function A calls function B via a SPI command, and B wasn't > executed previously in the current session, it would fail? Seems > entirely unacceptable.
Yep, thats right :(. Thanks, thats exactly the kind of feedback I wanted to get. I think we will see if we can get this fixed on the Safe/perl side then. Tim, I think unless the Safe::Hole stuff is really straight forward it seems like (as we previously agreed) the best change is to revert safe to its old behavior for now. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
