So there are no simple way to do it right, and it will be not fixed? Will this bug appear in todo list?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> wrote: > 2010/2/26 Oleg Serov <sero...@gmail.com>: > > Up! Anybody will answer about the patch? > > The patch causes the inheritance history to be lost. If you > subsequently drop the column form the parent it'll be kept on the > child because it was explicitly declared when you created the child. > In the original structure if you dropped the column from the parent it > would be dropped from the child because it was an inherited column. > > Inheritance is in a kind of no-mans land. It's not good enough to be > an important feature anyone cares enough about to make it work > properly and it's not shoddy enough that it's worth removing. I'm sure > there are people using it effectively despite the caveats and rough > edges. > > -- > greg > -- С уважением Олег Серов
