On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:25, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 12/15/10 4:58 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> > In any case, a doc patch would be the right thing for the back branches. >> >> I can look at this too (yes, I know we just wrapped, but I'm working >> down the backlog :S). You mean something as simple as "this parameter >> is unavailable if the server was not compiled with support for SSL"? > > Exactly. If you don't get around to it, bug me in January.
Done, and applied (doc patch for back branches, code patch for HEAD) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
