Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > If your point here is that you don't want to spend time hacking on > this because it's a fairly marginal feature and therefore not terribly > high on your priority list, I can understand that. But if you're > actually defending the current implementation, I'm going to have to > respectfully disagree. It's broken, and it sucks, and this is not the > first complaint we've had about it.
The spec's definition of USING is broken and sucky, and we're implementing it as best we can. I don't feel a need to invent strange nonstandard behavior to work around the fact that USING is fragile *by definition*. Complain to the standards committee about that. (Question: would you also have us try to work around the fact that USING stops working if you rename one of the join columns?) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs