The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6131
Logged by: David Johnston
Email address: pol...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4
Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit
Description: Query Returning Incorrect Results
Details:
The embedded script exhibits some strange behavior. When the query is run
the [adjustment_paid] column for [technician] "6338B" should show +/- 25.00.
Instead, if I run the last query immediately after creating the schema and
inserting the data the results I get for that technician is 0.00 for both
records. However, if I continue to run the query, or explicitly run ANALYZE
, I then get the correct results.
BTW, the other two records (techs 500A and 600A) show the expected values
each time the query is run. Also, only those four records are expected.
While I understand that ANALYZE should be run after loading in data I should
not get blatantly incorrect results - at worse I should suffer a performance
hit; though with only 40 or so records in the table performance is not
really a concern.
I can get this behavior to manifest consistently on my machine:
PostgreSQL 9.0.4, compiled by Visual C++ build 1500, 64-bit
FWIW, I execute all the following from a commercial GUI called PostgreSQL
Maestro.
Thanks,
David J.
--Begin Script
DROP VIEW IF EXISTS laborwip_payroll_entry_adjusted_ticket;
DROP VIEW IF EXISTS laborwip_payroll_technician_effectiverate;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS laborwip_payroll_ticket;
CREATE TABLE laborwip_payroll_ticket (
s_id varchar NOT NULL,
accountnumber varchar NOT NULL,
date_reference date NOT NULL,
ticketnumber varchar NOT NULL,
technician varchar NOT NULL,
date_paid date NOT NULL,
detail_category varchar NOT NULL CHECK (detail_category IN
('++','--','+0','0+','-0','0-')),
hours_paid numeric(7,2) NOT NULL,
amount_paid numeric(7,2) NOT NULL,
rate_paid numeric(7,2) NULL,
CONSTRAINT laborwip_payroll_ticket_houramountconsistency
CHECK ((amount_paid >= 0 AND hours_paid >= 0) OR
(amount_paid <= 0 AND hours_paid <= 0)),
PRIMARY KEY (s_id, accountnumber, date_reference, ticketnumber,
technician,
date_paid, detail_category)
);
INSERT INTO laborwip_payroll_ticket (s_id, accountnumber, date_reference,
ticketnumber, technician, date_paid, detail_category, amount_paid,
hours_paid, rate_paid) VALUES
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318421', '7001',
'1976-06-04', '++', 25, 2.5, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318426', '6120',
'1976-06-01', '++', 10, 1, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318427', '6120',
'1976-06-02', '++', 15, 1.5, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318210', '6124',
'1976-06-02', '++', 30, 2, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318322', '6126',
'1976-06-01', '++', 10, 0.5, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318361', '6126',
'1976-06-01', '++', 30, 1.5, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318285', '6126',
'1976-06-01', '++', 10, 0.5, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318227', '6124',
'1976-06-01', '++', 45, 3, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318396', '6126',
'1976-06-02', '++', 80, 4, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318431', '6126',
'1976-06-02', '++', 50, 2.5, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '317873', '6124',
'1976-06-02', '++', 15, 1, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318421', '6126',
'1976-06-02', '++', 50, 2.5, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318262', '6287',
'1976-06-01', '++', 2, 0.2, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318352', '6126',
'1976-06-01', '++', 25, 1, 25.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318364', '6126',
'1976-06-02', '++', 30, 1.5, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318210', '6124',
'1976-06-01', '++', 45, 3, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318267', '7003',
'1976-06-04', '--', -10, -1, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318274', '6287',
'1976-06-01', '++', 2, 0.2, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318412', '6120',
'1976-06-02', '++', 5, 0.5, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318182', '6338',
'1976-06-02', '++', 25, 1, 25.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318279', '6338B',
'1976-06-01', '++', 25, 1, 25.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318274', '7002',
'1976-06-04', '--', -30, -3, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318379', '6126',
'1976-06-02', '++', 30, 1.5, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318349', '6126',
'1976-06-01', '++', 20, 1, 20.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318257', '6287',
'1976-06-01', '++', 4, 0.4, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318213', '6016',
'1976-06-03', '++', 20, 1, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318254', '6124',
'1976-06-01', '++', 45, 3, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318431', '7002',
'1976-06-04', '++', 20, 2, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318262', '7003',
'1976-06-04', '--', -20, -2, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318182', '6338',
'1976-06-01', '++', 75, 3, 25.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318279', '6338B',
'1976-06-02', '++', 25, 1, 25.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '318267', '6287',
'1976-06-01', '++', 2, 0.2, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '400000', '6338B',
'1976-06-01', '+0', 0, 1, 0.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '400001', '6338B',
'1976-06-01', '-0', 0, -1, 0.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '400002', '6338B',
'1976-06-05', '++', 50, 5, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '400003', '500A',
'1976-06-05', '++', 120, 8, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '400003', '500A',
'1976-06-05', '+0', 0, 2, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE01', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '400003', '500B',
'1976-06-05', '++', 150, 10, 15.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE02', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '6000', '600A',
'1976-06-05', '++', 100.00, 10, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE02', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '6001', '600A',
'1976-06-06', '++', 20.00, 2, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE02', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '6002', '600A',
'1976-06-07', '++', 30.00, 3, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE02', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '6000', '600A',
'1976-06-05', '--', -30.00, -3, 10.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE02', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '6000', '600A',
'1976-06-05', '+0', 0.00, 1, 0.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE02', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '6000', '600A',
'1976-06-05', '0+', 20.00, 0, 0.00),
('[TESTSG]STORE02', 'LABORWIP', '1976-06-15', '6003', '600B',
'1976-06-05', '0+', 20.00, 0, 0.00)
;
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW laborwip_payroll_technician_effectiverate AS
SELECT s_id, date_reference, accountnumber, technician,
rate_paid::numeric(7,2) AS technician_rate
FROM (
SELECT s_id, date_reference, accountnumber, technician,
rate_paid,
rate_count,
(row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY s_id,
date_reference, accountnumber,
technician ORDER BY rate_count DESC)) AS rate_index
FROM (
SELECT s_id, date_reference, accountnumber, technician,
rate_paid,
COUNT(*) AS rate_count
FROM laborwip_payroll_ticket
--WHERE detail_category IN ( '++', '--' )
GROUP BY s_id, date_reference, accountnumber,
technician, rate_paid
) calc
) ranking
WHERE rate_index = 1
;
;
CREATE VIEW laborwip_payroll_entry_adjusted_ticket AS
SELECT
s_id, date_reference, accountnumber, ticketnumber, technician,
(SUM(hours_paid) * technician_rate)::numeric(10,2) AS
adjustment_paid,
'ADJ' || CASE WHEN SUM(hours_paid) < 0.00 THEN '-' ELSE '+' END ||
'H'::varchar AS description
FROM (SELECT s_id, date_reference, accountnumber, technician,
ticketnumber,
hours_paid, detail_category
FROM laborwip_payroll_ticket
WHERE detail_category IN ('-0','+0')
) ticket_info
NATURAL LEFT JOIN laborwip_payroll_technician_effectiverate
GROUP BY s_id, date_reference, accountnumber, ticketnumber,
detail_category, technician, technician_rate
;
--DO NOT RUN ANALYZE BEFORE EXECUTING THE FOLLOWING
SELECT * FROM laborwip_payroll_entry_adjusted_ticket;
--You should see the incorrect (0.00) results here
ANALYZE;
SELECT * FROM laborwip_payroll_entry_adjusted_ticket;
--And now you should have the correct (+/- 25.00) results
--End Script
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
