Julian Mehnle <jul...@mehnle.net> writes:
> I'm subscribed to the pgsql-bugs list, so no need to CC me. :-)
cc to people in the thread is the established practice on these lists.
It provides a bit more robustness when the lists are busy or slow.
You can set your subscription so the listserv won't send you an extra
copy, I believe, but I don't know the incantation offhand.
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not sure about a simple fix,
>> and I rather wonder if we shouldn't try to remove that code entirely
>> instead of "fix" it.
> What would "removing that code entirely" mean?
I was wondering why it's necessary to parse the entry in the dump file
at all, rather than just spit it out to PQexec as-is. There's probably
a reason, but maybe we can find another way to solve whatever the
real problem is.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
