Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar oct 04 10:39:27 -0300 2011:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Michael Meskes <mes...@postgresql.org> wrote:

> >> 2010 on Windows, which accepts "long long" to mean the same thing as
> >> __int64, but ECPG doesn't recognize the later.
> >> May be related to BUG #5464: ecpg on 64bit system converts "long long" to
> >> "long"
> >
> > Well, this bug is (at least I don't know otherwise) fixed for more than a 
> > year.
> > Maybe the configure test doesn't work on Windows? I don't know.
> 
> On at least some Windows builds, configure isn't used at all... so
> whatever values is being used would come from the MSVC build system.

In fact, pg_config.h.win32 does not have the HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT symbol
at all -- only HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 is in there.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to