lindebg <lind...@gmail.com> writes: > On 11/19/2011 04:34 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Color me skeptical. Under what conceivable use-case could you have >> functions that were mutually dependent in that way? And actually did >> something useful (not recurse till stack overflow) when called?
> Does this mean that this situation will not be handled by pg_dump / > pg_restore? If you can convince me that there is some actual real-world use case for a situation like this, I might think about complicating pg_dump to the point where it would handle it. If it's only an artificial corner case, I don't think that the added complexity (and ensuing long-term maintenance costs, plus risk of new bugs) is worth it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs