On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:42 AM, nowind_lee <nowind_...@qq.com> wrote: > I've read some discussions before I write this post. I know that > "rs.getMetaData.getTableName" always return empty string just because the > developers think it should be alias name in the query, not the underlying > table name, which is hard to implement, so it's best to leave it blank. > > And also there is a "PGResultSetMetaData.getBaseTableName()" can be used to > get the table name. > > I understand this, but it make something very hard. Please see my question: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9247064/play2s-anorm-cant-work-on-postgresql > > From the implementation of play's anorm framework, we know that most of > other jdbc drivers all return the underlying table name in > "rs.getMetaData.getTableName". It make the parse of result set of "join" > query easily. > > Since all other drivers have the same action, will postgresql driver do it > too? I think return the underlying table name is much more useful than an > empty string.
I think you might want to post this question to the pgsql-jdbc mailing list, rather than here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
