2012/3/5 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Hello >> I found a plpgsql bug: > >> create or replace function fx() >> returns void as $$ >> declare a int; b int; >> begin >> select 10,20 into a; >> end; >> $$ language plpgsql; > >> this is bug, or minimally potential source of strange behave. > > AFAICS this is intentional --- see the comment in exec_move_row. > > In any case, I think tightening it up is more likely to break working > applications than do anything helpful.
I agree with you about break working application :( But this is good example what should be checked in CHECK statement. but it should be bug - it has no sense - no in this form - it is assign row to scalar. I found a some mysterious and very difficult identified bugs in one application based on this behave. Regards Pavel > > regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
