Tomonari Katsumata <katsumata.tomon...@po.ntts.co.jp> writes: > Thank you for explanation about it. > I've understood that it is intended thing. > Sorry to bother you.
No, actually it's a good thing you brought it up, because we're now reconsidering whether that patch was a good idea or not ... http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg00160.php regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
