On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:21:58AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: >> >>> address the points I made about reproducing the previous state in cases >> >>> where the admin removed the language or changed its permissions. >> >> >> Well, it still does the create extension in binary mode like before --- >> >> not sure what the problem is. >> >> > Applied and back-patched to 9.2. >> >> I do not believe that this patch fixes the problem, and I also believe >> that it creates new problems. Please revert. > > I asked for an explaination of the problem, but received no reply: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2012-07/msg00005.php > > so I assumed you were fine with it. Please explain. Does anyone else > understand the problem Tom is seeing?
Well, the part I understood was that your fix apparently does not guarantee to restore plpgsql to the state it was in, just to restore it to existence. But previous complaints about similar issues have fallen on deaf ears (see bug #5184). Perhaps Tom has had a change of heart, but if so we have a few things to fix, not just this one. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
