lirex.softw...@gmail.com writes: > 3. select id, str_last_name from tbl_owners_individual order by > str_last_name offset 53;
> ... > 1 | Kolesnik > 111 | Kolesnik > 251 | XXXXXXXXXX > 112 | XXXXX > ... > 4. select id, str_last_name from tbl_owners_individual order by > str_last_name limit 1 offset 53; > 111 | Kolesnik This is not a bug. Your ORDER BY does not fully determine the order of the rows (since all rows with str_last_name = 'Kolesnik' sort the same); so Postgres is entitled to return equivalent rows in any order, or to select any subset of the equivalent rows for a LIMIT query. It's not completely nondeterministic, of course, but I suspect if you examine EXPLAIN results you'll find that different query plans got chosen for the queries with and without LIMIT. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs