Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie jun 22 22:37:10 -0400 2012:
> j...@pgexperts.com writes:
> > DROP and CREATE extension appear to work fine, but if you ALTER EXTENSION
> > postgis SET SCHEMA foo, it leaves a few relations behind.
> 
> What it seems to be leaving behind is indexes ... also relation rowtypes.
> 
> A bit of looking shows that ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA calls
> AlterObjectNamespace_oid on the table.  AlterObjectNamespace_oid
> calls AlterRelationNamespaceInternal, and nothing else.  In comparison,
> ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA (AlterTableNamespace) calls
> AlterRelationNamespaceInternal and about four other things.  I'm not
> sure if this was broken before the last round of refactoring in this
> area, but for sure it's broken now.

Aha, I see the bug.  It seems the split for AlterObjectNamespace_oid
related to tables was done at the wrong level: there should be a new
AlterTableNamespace_internal call that does all the extra stuff, and
which is to be called from AlterObjectNamespace_oid.

FWIW this bug seems to have been introduced in the initial extensions
commit, d9572c4e3b474031060189050e14ef384b94e001.  Prior to that we had
ExecAlterObjectSchemaStmt calling AlterTableNamespace directly.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to