I am seeing the situation where the reported flush location for the sync standby (standby1 below) is *behind* the reported current xlog location of the primary. This is Postgres 9.1.5 , and I was under the impression that transactions initiated on the master do not commit until the corresponding wal is flushed on the sync standby.

Now the standby is definitely working in sync mode, because stopping it halts all write transactions on the primary (sync_standby_names contains only standby1). So is the reported lag in flush location merely an artifact of timing in the query, or is there something else going on? [1]

db=# SELECT application_name,pg_current_xlog_location(),sent_location,write_location,flush_location,replay_location,sync_priority,state
     FROM pg_stat_replication where replay_location is not null;
application_name | pg_current_xlog_location | sent_location | write_location | flush_location | replay_location | sync_priority | state
------------------+--------------------------+---------------+----------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------+-----------
standby1 | E/254909E0 | E/25490000 | E/2548C3B8 | E/2548C3B8 | E/25476DE0 | 1 | streaming <=== standby2 | E/254909E0 | E/2548C3B8 | E/25476DE0 | E/25476DE0 | E/254724C0 | 0 | streaming standby3 | E/254909E0 | E/254909E0 | E/25476DE0 | E/25476DE0 | E/254724C0 | 0 | streaming standby4 | E/254909E0 | E/25490000 | E/2548C3B8 | E/25476DE0 | E/25476DE0 | 0 | streaming standby5 | E/254909E0 | E/25490000 | E/25476DE0 | E/25476DE0 | E/254724C0 | 0 | streaming
(5 rows)


Cheers

Mark

[1] Looking at the code for pg_stat_replication, it appears to take the sync rep lock while reporting, so in theory should be exactly right...I should perhaps check what pg_current_xlog_location does...


--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Reply via email to