Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us > writes: >I concluded that it probably wasn't a good idea to have the additional state transition in SIGINT handling. Generally >PM_STARTUP means "we're running the startup process and nothing else", and that's useful state info that we shouldn't >throw away lightly.
I tested the patch, it is working fine. I have a query regarding the changing of pmState only incase of SIGTERM but not incase of SIGINT. Is there any reason to handle like this? or Is it ok to modify the handling of pmState in SIGTERM same as SIGINT? Regards, Hari babu. -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
